14th Amendment Blog Series part 1- ongoing research into how the Cincinnati Radiation Litigation Research can be used to help those who are unwilling participants in the Covid Bioweapon that was unleashed on the world.

Will cover the known legal documents where the

Department of Defense used Human Test Subjects without their consent to test how people would respond to Radiation Poisoning.

       Many of the the legal documents quoted here are from the Cincinnati Radiation Litigation court documents. U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. In re Cincinnati Radiation Litigation. Fed Suppl. 1995;874:796-833. PMID: 15751169  in addition to other court proceedings and legal schollars that have utilized the well established rules that set a precendence based on the established Constitutional Laws and Amendments.    All the images used in this blog post, twitter posts, and thread reader pdf below quote the souces used.  

The Author states:

  I cannot ignore the similarities of the well documented- though shrowded in secrecy how the Government Agencies performed the same tactics of the Human Radiation Experiements when comparing the current and ongoing Covid19 fiasco.

Intro in the 14th Amendment legalese quoted on National Institute of Health  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15751169/> #CincinnatiRadiationLitigation. > The Govt / Dept of Def experimented on people w/out consent> Hasn’t the same thing been proven with the Covid19 Bioweapon???

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, allowed the heirs and personal representatives of now deceased cancer patients to proceed on

  • constitutional grounds against government and university physicians who used them in radiation exposure experiments without any or proper informed consent. Between 1960 and 1972,
  • the Department of Defense funded research on radiation exposure to humans, which was administered by the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and performed at Cincinnati General Hospital.
  • Their research subjects were cancer patients with life expectancies at the most for two years, and also primarily indigent, poorly educated, and of lower than average intelligence, with a majority being African-American.
  • The patients were told that the radiation was for their benefit, cancer treatment, and
  • were not told that the radiation dosage was determined by the experimental design of the research, “to study the effects of maasive doses of radiation on human beings in preparation for a possible nuclear war.
  • When consent forms came into use, the risk of radiation exposure to the patients was not stated.
  • The court found that the defendants were not acting as physicians, but instead were acting “as scientists interested in nothing more than assembling cold data.”
  • Consequently, their actions were outside the scope of their hired duties to care for the sick and injured, and thus not immune to prosecution under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment for violations of liberty and equal protection of rights.

The rooms still exist at the hospital and are sealed off.